初次翻開這本書時,我被它那看似平淡無奇的敘事節奏稍微難住瞭,節奏慢得像夏日午後粘稠的空氣,讓人幾乎想直接跳到衝突爆發點。但堅持讀下去後,我纔領悟到這種緩慢正是其魅力所在——它強迫你放慢自己的呼吸,像一個耐心的考古學傢,去挖掘字裏行間埋藏的綫索。作者的句子結構有一種奇特的韻律感,長短句交錯間,構建齣一種既古典又現代的文學質地。尤其是在描寫人物的肢體語言和環境細節時,那種精確度簡直令人驚嘆,每一個道具、每一束光綫似乎都有其存在的深意,共同烘托齣一種無聲的戲劇張力。這不像是一部情節驅動的小說,更像是一係列精心編排的舞颱劇片段,光影交錯中,你看清瞭角色的虛僞,也看到瞭他們偶爾閃現的、真實得令人心碎的脆弱。讀完後,你會覺得自己的文學品味都被提升瞭一個檔次,因為它考驗的不是你的耐心,而是你的敏感度。
评分這本書的厲害之處,在於它對“小鎮”這個概念的重新定義。它不是田園牧歌,而是某種精心布置的、高壓力的微縮社會試驗場。每個人都清楚彆人的底細,但又都默契地遵守著一套心照不宣的潛規則。我特彆欣賞作者處理時間的方式,他經常在一段場景的描述中突然插入一段對過去某個關鍵時刻的迴溯,這種跳躍感處理得極為自然,沒有絲毫生硬的痕跡。正是這些碎片化的記憶,拼湊齣瞭角色們如今的僵局。而且,書中對酒精和婚姻關係的處理簡直是教科書級彆的。那種在派對上故作輕鬆,一杯接一杯地灌下烈酒,試圖麻醉自己對現實不滿的狀態,描寫得入木三分,讓人感同身受。它沒有提供任何簡單的答案或廉價的安慰,隻是把這些復雜的人性睏境赤裸裸地攤開在你麵前,讓你自己去體會那份無力感。
评分這本書的結構和主題的復雜性,使得它更像是一部精密的交響樂,而非簡單的獨奏麯。每一個人物的命運綫索,看似獨立,實則通過微妙的事件和共同的生活環境緊密交織在一起,形成一張龐大而無形的網。作者的敘事視角在不同人物間流暢切換,像是在空中盤鏇的無人機,時而聚焦於某對夫妻的冷戰,時而又拉遠景拍攝整個社區的浮躁。最讓我印象深刻的是,作者幾乎從不使用直接的內心獨白來解釋角色的動機,而是通過他們與環境、與他人的互動,以及那些未說齣口的話語,讓讀者自己去推斷。這種“留白”的處理方式,極大地增強瞭作品的藝術感染力。它要求讀者主動參與到意義的構建中來,這使得每一次重讀都會帶來新的領悟,絕非一次性消費品。它成功地捕捉到瞭現代生活中的一種核心矛盾:我們擁有瞭一切,卻好像失去瞭最本質的東西。
评分這本小說簡直是美國中産階級生活圖景的一麵鏡子,每一頁都散發著那種精緻而又令人窒息的疏離感。作者對人物內心世界的刻畫入木三分,那種潛藏在完美郊區生活錶象下的焦慮、欲望和無法言說的空虛,被他用一種近乎冷峻的筆觸描摹得淋灕盡緻。你仿佛能聞到那些修剪得一絲不苟的草坪上殘留的除草劑氣味,聽到鄰裏間那些禮貌卻又暗藏機鋒的寒暄。角色們在看似穩定的一切中掙紮,他們的情感就像被緊緊包裹在保鮮膜裏的食物,時間一久,味道就開始微妙地變質。讀著讀著,我常常會停下來,盯著窗外,思考自己是不是也曾在不經意間,成為瞭自己生活裏的一個陌生觀察者。那種對“美國夢”破裂的細膩捕捉,不是宏大的控訴,而是生活細節裏一點一滴的滲漏,讓人讀完後久久不能平復,心裏總有一塊地方感到微微的涼意。它揭示瞭在物質豐裕的背景下,精神世界可能麵臨的荒蕪,讓人不禁反思,我們究竟在追逐些什麼。
评分坦白說,這本書的閱讀體驗是雙刃劍。一方麵,它的文學成就毋庸置疑,那種對語言的駕馭能力,對白中蘊含的潛颱詞,都是頂尖水平。但另一方麵,它帶來的情緒負荷非常重。你很難在其中找到一個可以真正寄托希望的角色,大部分人似乎都深陷於自己親手編織的、華麗卻又冰冷的牢籠中無法自拔。它像一麵高倍放大的鏡子,照齣瞭人類共同的缺陷:對身份的過度執著、對情感錶達的恐懼、以及對“體麵”二字的病態追求。我讀到中期時,甚至産生瞭一種強烈的疏離感,仿佛不是在看故事,而是在觀察一個物種的退化過程。這絕不是一本適閤睡前放鬆的書籍,它需要你投入全部的注意力去解碼,去感受那種彌漫在空氣中,連陽光都無法穿透的陰鬱。
评分A Booker Award winning fictional autobiography of an Australian 'bushranger' in the late 1800's written as a series of letters to his daughter purportedly in the style of Ned Kelly, an uneducated son of a transport convict who, despite good intentions, finds himself at the notorious head of an outlaw gang. Apparently Kelly was in fact a real person unbeknownst to me and this is based on his life and his dramatic death.
评分A Booker Award winning fictional autobiography of an Australian 'bushranger' in the late 1800's written as a series of letters to his daughter purportedly in the style of Ned Kelly, an uneducated son of a transport convict who, despite good intentions, finds himself at the notorious head of an outlaw gang. Apparently Kelly was in fact a real person unbeknownst to me and this is based on his life and his dramatic death.
评分。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
评分。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
评分Cheever的小说没怎么看过,买一本看看。卢弼在《覆胡绥之先生书》中,对前人研究、考订《三国志》的成果,作了评价:“竹汀、晦之,昆仲济美,如论精核,弟逊于兄。少章、慕庐,能见其大。大宗补注,精义无多。安溪侃侃,义正辞严。瓯北、西庄,谈锋犀利。稚安考证,多详日月。东潜注补,包贯众流。侯、姚艺文,姚为繁富。沈引书目,后来居先。梁氏旁证,喜摭异闻。琐言晚出,持论衡平。援鹑笔记,非其专长。孟慈职官,颇称明备,洪、谢、吴、杨,详述疆域。刘氏知意,专主实斋。官本考证,剽窃何、陈,专攻明监,所见已隘,纪传莫辨,廪禄虚糜。诸家成书,短长互见。”这一段话,涉及钱大昕《廿二史考异》、钱大昭《三国志辨疑》、陈景云《三国志辨误》、杭世骏《三国志补注》、赵翼《廿二史札记》、王鸣盛《十七史商榷》、潘眉《三国志考证》、赵一清《三国志注补》、侯康《补三国艺文志》、姚振宗《三国艺文志》、沈家本《三国志注所引书目》、梁章钜《三国志旁证》、沈家本《三国志琐言》、姚范《援鹑堂笔记》、洪饴孙《三国职官表》、洪亮吉《补三国疆域志》、谢钟英《补三国疆域志补注》、吴增仅《三国郡县表》、杨守敬《三国郡县表补正》、刘咸炘《三国志知意》等书。这不过是《集解》引书的一小部分。可惜《集解》未附录“引用书目”,引书时一般只标作者姓名,而不标书名篇名(个别的除外),读者感到查检不便。 在上述古籍中,卢弼对赵一清(东潜)《三国志注补》的评价最高,但也指出其不足之处。卢弼引书,有三种情况:一是只引用,无补充;二是引用之后,有所发挥;三是引用之后,进行辨驳。他在《序例》中,对第三种情况,作了说明:“诸家笺注,东潜最为繁富,然秕稗留遗,愆违盈目,随文纠正,无所隐饰。推之众说,亦复云然。或谓既知乖舛,即宜芟除,奚为存录,徒秽篇章。不知摭拾不周,人疑阙漏,匡矫不力,虑失真诠,虽云辞费,实非贸然。”可见《集解》所追求的目标是,引书既要全而不漏,又不能听任谬说传播。古籍因年代久远,读者难以明了,需要为之作注。注释因年代久远,读者也难以明了,需要为之作疏。卢弼继承这个传统,既为《三国志》作注,又为裴注作疏,他在《序例》中,说明这样做的理由:“或谓陈志简洁,注释宜详,裴注明通,奚事诠解。不知世期所采,都为魏晋名编,流传到今,悉成故书雅记。温公《通鉴》,摘取颇多,身之音注,亦极畅达。(《通鉴》多采裴注,胡氏于所采者多有注)理宜搜罗,藉便浏览。注家有疏,已成先例,曲折剖判,不厌求详。亦有裴注偶误,间存商榷,疑滞扫除,敷畅厥指,亦学者所有事也。”裴注完成于元嘉六年(429),1500多年来的研究、考订成果很多,卢弼加以收集、整理,并发表自己的见解,写入《集解》中,不仅给读者带来方便,而且增加了《集解》的学术价值。试举一例,以见卢弼兼注《三国志》正文和裴注,是必要的,不是多馀的。 《魏书·武帝纪》裴注引《魏书》:“太尉桥玄,世名知人,睹太祖而异之,曰:‘吾见天下名士多矣,未有若君者也!君善自持。吾老矣!愿以妻子为托。'由是声名益重。” 《集解》:“《世说·识鉴篇》:曹公少时见桥玄,玄谓曰:天下方乱,群雄虎争,拨而理之,非君乎?然君实是乱世之英雄,治世之奸贼。恨吾老矣,不见君富贵,当以子孙相累。刘孝标注以《世说》所言为谬。弼按:刘注是。若桥公谓为奸贼,魏武必不祀以太牢矣。” 《魏书·武帝纪》裴注引孙盛《异同杂语》:“(太祖)尝问许子将:‘我何如人?'子将不答。固问之,子将曰:‘子治世之能臣,乱世之奸雄。'” 《集解》:“胡三省曰:言其才绝世也。天下治则尽其能为世用,天下乱则逞其智为时雄。弼按:二语实为确论,无愧汝南月旦之评。《蜀志·许靖传》:靖与曹公书云:自窜蛮貊,成阔十年,吉凶礼废。昔在会稽,得所贻书,辞旨款密,久要不忘。是魏武与子将昆仲夙有雅故。少年即与名流结纳,可知其人。胡玉缙曰:二语恐孙盛因晋承魏祚,有所避忌,加以窜改,当以范书《许劭传》为得其实。后丕深嫉月旦,欲取其首,未始不由于此,况劭本鄙操者乎!
评分A Booker Award winning fictional autobiography of an Australian 'bushranger' in the late 1800's written as a series of letters to his daughter purportedly in the style of Ned Kelly, an uneducated son of a transport convict who, despite good intentions, finds himself at the notorious head of an outlaw gang. Apparently Kelly was in fact a real person unbeknownst to me and this is based on his life and his dramatic death.
评分John CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn CheeverJohn Cheever
评分A Booker Award winning fictional autobiography of an Australian 'bushranger' in the late 1800's written as a series of letters to his daughter purportedly in the style of Ned Kelly, an uneducated son of a transport convict who, despite good intentions, finds himself at the notorious head of an outlaw gang. Apparently Kelly was in fact a real person unbeknownst to me and this is based on his life and his dramatic death.
评分A Booker Award winning fictional autobiography of an Australian 'bushranger' in the late 1800's written as a series of letters to his daughter purportedly in the style of Ned Kelly, an uneducated son of a transport convict who, despite good intentions, finds himself at the notorious head of an outlaw gang. Apparently Kelly was in fact a real person unbeknownst to me and this is based on his life and his dramatic death.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 tushu.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 求知書站 版权所有