"Think Again is a must-read for anyone who wants to create a culture of learning and exploration, whether at home, at work, or at school... In an increasingly divided world, the lessons in this book are more important than ever."
--Bill and Melinda Gates
The bestselling author of Give and Take and Originals examines the critical art of rethinking: learning to question your opinions and open other people's minds, which can position you for excellence at work and wisdom in life
Intelligence is usually seen as the ability to think and learn, but in a rapidly changing world, there's another set of cognitive skills that might matter more: the ability to rethink and unlearn. In our daily lives, too many of us favor the comfort of conviction over the discomfort of doubt. We listen to opinions that make us feel good, instead of ideas that make us think hard. We see disagreement as a threat to our egos, rather than an opportunity to learn. We surround ourselves with people who agree with our conclusions, when we should be gravitating toward those who challenge our thought process. The result is that our beliefs get brittle long before our bones. We think too much like preachers defending our sacred beliefs, prosecutors proving the other side wrong, and politicians campaigning for approval--and too little like scientists searching for truth. Intelligence is no cure, and it can even be a curse: being good at thinking can make us worse at rethinking. The brighter we are, the blinder to our own limitations we can become.
Organizational psychologist Adam Grant is an expert on opening other people's minds--and our own. As Wharton's top-rated professor and the bestselling author of Originals and Give and Take, he makes it one of his guiding principles to argue like he's right but listen like he's wrong. With bold ideas and rigorous evidence, he investigates how we can embrace the joy of being wrong, bring nuance to charged conversations, and build schools, workplaces, and communities of lifelong learners. You'll learn how an international debate champion wins arguments, a Black musician persuades white supremacists to abandon hate, a vaccine whisperer convinces concerned parents to immunize their children, and Adam has coaxed Yankees fans to root for the Red Sox. Think Again reveals that we don't have to believe everything we think or internalize everything we feel. It's an invitation to let go of views that are no longer serving us well and prize mental flexibility over foolish consistency. If knowledge is power, knowing what we don't know is wisdom.
##We favor the comfort of conviction over the discomfort of doubt. We laugh at people who still use Windows 95, yet we still cling to opinions that we formed in 1995.
评分##读这本书的时候总会让我想到项飚老师的铁索桥的比喻 不论是个人、人际还是社会中的许多问题,当我们思维固化了之后,我们的观点就是铁板一块,一切新进来的信息对我们而言不过是为自我确认添砖加瓦 从而更进一步固化本就是铁板一块的观点 但是在很多问题上更应该是时时用新的信息更新我们的观点 拥抱并且接受那些不确定性 就像项飚老师说的铁索桥 有一块块木板 但是整个桥又是活动的 这边松下去 那边翘起来 应该是一个动态的不断更新不断变化的过程而不是一个终点 这本书好像也为我近半年的思考做了一个总结 以前总认为坚定的信念才是颠扑不破的 但铁板一块的信念崩塌的时候其结果也是摧枯拉朽痛苦不堪的 反而本身拥抱了不确定性 围绕一条主线但不乏变化的观点和信念才是更持久的
评分##reminds me of those compulsory rhetoric and argumentation lessons I once attended and somewhat enjoyed
评分##这个就很有意思了,这是今年看过的第二本叫Think Again的书,第一本讲的是how to argue,这本讲的是如何确保自己所持有的观点没有问题。几十年前有个哲学家说过我们社会一个很大的问题就是傻逼们坚信自己但知识分子满腹疑虑,挪到现在依然适用。当你忽略客观事实来通过各种手段维护自己的观点的时候,就把自己从科学家的角度变成了传教者和政治人物的角色。无独有偶之前那本讲argue的书也有一个观点,辩论的时候如果你的观点被改变其实是一种收获,因为在这场交涉中你学习到了新的东西,而对方可能没有。
评分##读这本书的时候总会让我想到项飚老师的铁索桥的比喻 不论是个人、人际还是社会中的许多问题,当我们思维固化了之后,我们的观点就是铁板一块,一切新进来的信息对我们而言不过是为自我确认添砖加瓦 从而更进一步固化本就是铁板一块的观点 但是在很多问题上更应该是时时用新的信息更新我们的观点 拥抱并且接受那些不确定性 就像项飚老师说的铁索桥 有一块块木板 但是整个桥又是活动的 这边松下去 那边翘起来 应该是一个动态的不断更新不断变化的过程而不是一个终点 这本书好像也为我近半年的思考做了一个总结 以前总认为坚定的信念才是颠扑不破的 但铁板一块的信念崩塌的时候其结果也是摧枯拉朽痛苦不堪的 反而本身拥抱了不确定性 围绕一条主线但不乏变化的观点和信念才是更持久的
评分##试读了个开头,发现畅销书体的味特冲:开头写个故事,然后提出观点,用新的词语包装旧的理论,然后说上一段解释。有点受不了,暂时放下吧,最近没心情没耐性,过了这段时间再去看看推进他人的和集体的rethinking的章节写得怎么样。
评分##其实为何要重新思考,对应的其实是战胜这个世界的本质-如何抵抗熵增。人的思维成长成型的过程也是固化的过程,重新思考就是开放大脑,在艰难中选择自信又谦虚,避免僵化。相信自己有能力去成长理解,但同时又知道自己资源和知识的欠缺。自信缺不完美。但不被自己的观点、身份、以前的自己所绑架,这在我看来是不可能的,屁股决定脑袋,知道自己是被影响就够了,自我至少是清醒的。
评分##这个就很有意思了,这是今年看过的第二本叫Think Again的书,第一本讲的是how to argue,这本讲的是如何确保自己所持有的观点没有问题。几十年前有个哲学家说过我们社会一个很大的问题就是傻逼们坚信自己但知识分子满腹疑虑,挪到现在依然适用。当你忽略客观事实来通过各种手段维护自己的观点的时候,就把自己从科学家的角度变成了传教者和政治人物的角色。无独有偶之前那本讲argue的书也有一个观点,辩论的时候如果你的观点被改变其实是一种收获,因为在这场交涉中你学习到了新的东西,而对方可能没有。
评分##对于个人在集体中合作有极大的帮助. 如果你有很多个人理由反驳对方 不要一一列举 对方针对你最薄弱的理由反驳 所以只需要使用最有利的论据
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 tushu.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 求知書站 版权所有