1. Introduction: party-based authoritarianism in China
2. A theory of authoritarian regime parties
Part II. The Party in Contemporary China:
3. The CCP as co-enforcer of the one-child policy
4. The CCP's support in generating the state's material base
Part III. The Party's Origins:
5. War contingencies at the origin of the CCP's power base
6. The shifting geography of the CCP's power base (1949–2016)
Part IV. The Party in the Mao Era:
7. Can the CCP disobey? The great leap famine (1958–61)
8. The CCP and regime survival in times of crisis (1967–9)
9. Conclusion
Appendices
References.
· · · · · · (收起)
具体描述
In most non-democratic countries, today governing forty-four percent of the world population, the power of the regime rests upon a ruling party. Contrasting with conventional notions that authoritarian regime parties serve to contain elite conflict and manipulate electoral-legislative processes, this book presents the case of China and shows that rank and-file members of the Communist Party allow the state to penetrate local communities. Subnational comparative analysis demonstrates that in 'red areas' with high party saturation, the state is most effectively enforcing policy and collecting taxes. Because party membership patterns are extremely enduring, they must be explained by events prior to the Communist takeover in 1949. Frontlines during the anti-colonial Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945) continue to shape China's political map even today. Newly available evidence from the Great Leap Forward (1958–1961) and the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976) shows how a strong local party basis sustained the regime in times of existential crisis.
Draws on a vast amount of new data
Uses a range of methods, including field observation, archival research, formal modeling, and statistical tests
Offers conclusions that can be used comparatively to study authoritarian regimes
Read more at http://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/politics-international-relations/comparative-politics/where-party-rules-rank-and-file-chinas-communist-state#PmqK7rOHgCEr0FUL.99
用户评价
##读的体验太差了，理论框架、地理位置和时间变来变去，非常碎片化，几乎什么都要涵盖但什么都没讲清楚
评分##This is the epitome of 外宾视角
评分##读近年的政治学著作，越来越坚信政治学药丸／已丸。对比几十年前的书，简直是天渊之别。不管数据多么惊人，永远深陷一个用相关解释因果，用单一遮盖多元的泥潭。
评分【翻过】“革命老区”传统对49后政治经济之影响。作者发现，抗日时期党渗透最深的几个根据地，相比其他地方，在大跃进/文革时期更能抵制过激政策，而在78后对计划生育与财税改革中却又执行最力。作者认为，差异不在党的力量，而在党的性质。这些地方党组织的力量一直很强，只不过性质上从party of revolutionaries变成了party in power，从self-corrective device变成了policy implementer。似乎是一个颇有趣的脑洞，定量方法部分不懂，不好评价其结论...
评分##野心很大的话痨
评分##读近年的政治学著作，越来越坚信政治学药丸／已丸。对比几十年前的书，简直是天渊之别。不管数据多么惊人，永远深陷一个用相关解释因果，用单一遮盖多元的泥潭。
评分##好书好书
评分##读近年的政治学著作，越来越坚信政治学药丸／已丸。对比几十年前的书，简直是天渊之别。不管数据多么惊人，永远深陷一个用相关解释因果，用单一遮盖多元的泥潭。
评分##This is the epitome of 外宾视角
相关图书
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 tushu.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 求知書站 版权所有